President Trump: North Korean International Catalyst

I don’t talk much about politics, and the intent is certainly not to talk about it here on a daily basis.  I like to talk about theory; the ‘what ifs’ in our daily lives.

President Trump has not been known or recognized by his peers as someone that actually inspires change.  I didn’t vote for him (and I didn’t vote for Hillary either), and I’m lost somewhere between defending the Office of the Presidency even with Trump in it, and not vomiting.  It’s a weird place to be mentally.  Sometimes I can’t see myself saying that I can’t believe we’re barely 25% done with this term yet.

With that being said, I think we ought to give credit where credit is due.  Over the last 6 months there has been a dramatic shift with the North Koreans, and that is due, in part, because Trump stirred the pot.  Trump said he’s going to deal with the North Koreans.  He said he’ll put pressure on China.  He did both of those things by being a catalyst – he changed the status quo.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/26/world/korea-summit-kang-kyung-wha-amanpour-intl/index.html

 

(CNN) South Korea’s foreign minister has said she believes President Donald Trump is largely responsible for bringing North Korean leader Kim Jong-un to the negotiating table.

Speaking ahead of Friday’s historic summit between the leaders of North and South Korea, Kang Kyung-wha told CNN that the US President had played a significant role in bringing the two sides together.

“Clearly, credit goes to President Trump,” Kang told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour in Seoul. “He’s been determined to come to grips with this from day one.”

People tend to forget how much Trump has done with regard to North Korea. Six months ago, Trump signed a coal deal with China.  This helped China because they were too dependent on coal from North Korea to block it, but with the deal from Trump they are in a fine position for their coal deliveries.

A month after the coal began arriving into China, they stopped all imports from North Korea.  With China no longer helping North Korea, all the DPRK has is Russia to turn to while the US-backed sanctions continued to bite.

North Korea turned to the black market to try and bypass sanctions, but the International community caught them.

European countries started smelling the roses, and Sweden – a North Korean allay – basically told them they’re going to withdraw their embassy if they did not sit at the table and negotiate.  North Korea can not sit and threaten the ROK, the United States, and the rest of the world with no response.

Additionally, with President Xi in China consolidating power in China making himself essentially President for life, China can no longer kick the DPRK into the tall grass for the next person to deal with.  Xi IS the tall grass now, and best to deal with the DPRK now than later.  Broker peace now, or be replaced.

So in this case, it appears that Trump’s unorthodox decisions have actually worked out in our favor.  Upsetting the status quo has proven to be exactly what was needed.  As much as it pains me to say it, Trump should get some credit for this.  While we are in the early stages of NPRK/ROK peace, it’s encouraging what has transpired over the last 36 hours.

A user on Reddit (SovietWomble) posted a rather lengthy “dumbed down” version of the NPRK crisis into a well done and elaborate version of a playground.  It’s a good read.

Trump may not be the solution, but he is the catalyst – chemically speaking.

 

Time For Some Campaigning!

The people at JibJab.com are back with a new great parody of this year’s election. If you haven’t seen their work before, check out the video below. Then, go to their website. While this video isn’t their best work, it’s still very funny.

Good Old Boris, RIP

Boris Yeltsin died today. I kind of liked the guy. He was the first Russian leader elected by the populous, and he definitely had a face you could laugh at. He was a bit of a drinker though, but then again, what Russian isn’t? Here’s Bill and him yucking it up. RIP, Boris.

British Sailors Captured by Iran

At this point, it seems pretty obvious that the British soldiers were in Iraqi waters, and that the Iranian military had captured them illegally. Even if the U.S. Military is gearing up for a summer attack on Iran, I am not quite sure why the Iranians would create a hostage situation first. Surely 13 odd soldiers wouldn’t stop an attack by the U.S. or England, and if anything, might incite an attack.

Another thing I question is why the British soldiers were captured to begin with. Nothing against them, but I’m sure the U.S. Navy or Marines would go down with a heck of a firefight. Everyone has a right to self-defense, and I’m sure self-preservation is a key goal of the military.

I hope these hostages are released soon, and if they are not released, I support covert military action to get them out.

Cheney, an Earthquake in Jersey, and Safe Ports

So a lot has happened in the last week. VP Dick Cheney shot someone in the face. This person then apologized for being in his way. Something is fishy there; doesn’t the burden of proof/responsibility rely on the shooter? Something tells me that perhaps Cheney might have been drinking, and this might be one big “cover up” to protect his job?

Next, an earthquake in northern New Jersey registered 2.6, just barely enough for humans to feel.

And yesterday it was announced that an UAE (United Arab Emirates) firm has won a contract to take over 6 U.S. seaports, from Boston to Miami. Umm…hello? Did we just give control over what goes in and out of a port to a country that has sponsored terrorism? We did. Two of the alleged 9/11 hijackers came from the UAE, and money laundered for 9/11 was found linked to banks within the UAE. How is it that Bush has allowed a firm in a country linked to terrorism to gain control over what goes in and out of American ports?

Sure, people will say I have a political agenda, or I’m not being PC, but this is what I say. Go fuck yourself. We should not be relinquishing control of these ports to any foreign government, much less a government with a less than steller record on terrorism.

Call me crazy, but I hope someone puts a stop to it. Luckily, there is quite a bit of bipartisan objection to the UAE firm gaining control, but it sounds like it’s falling on deaf ears at the white house. Apparently, if the President doesn’t listen, those against this contract stated that they will try and freeze the contract. We’ll see what happens.

Freedom of Speech Violated Again

Cindy Sheehan, anti-war protestor is escorted out of the State of the Union Address & Arrested

President Bush’s cronies have done it once again. Cindy Sheehan, popular anti-war and anti-administration protestor was escorted out of the State of the Union Address on 1/31/06 for wearing a t-shirt, and was later arrested for the same offesne. A second woman, Beverly Young, wife of U.S. Rep Bill Young (R) of Florida, was also escorted out of the State of the Union address. Both women, wearing t-shirts that voiced a simple opinion were told to leave.

Sheehan’s t-shirt said: “2,245 Dead. How many more?”
Young’s t-shirt said: “Support the Troops.”

U.S. Capitol Police have later apologized to both women, and are recommending that all charges be dropped against Sheehan.

However, the issue is larger than “a simple mistake in protocol”. It is evidence yet again of mere dissention and disagreement with the viewpoint of the current administration will result in the stifling of your opinion, and being arrested for wearing a piece of clothing expressing a point of view.

Simply disagreeing with the Bush Administration is a punishable offense.

People, let’s wake the hell up and get this guy out of office. It’s ok to say that the emporer has no clothes.

P.S. – Don’t get me wrong, I think Cindy Sheehan’s meeting with Hugo Chavez this week discussing the toppling of the U.S.Empire might be construed as treason, so for that I would tend to disagree with her. That being said, she had a son who fought and died in Iraq, which makes her point of view much more riviting and passionate then mine.

Iran Rips Up Nuclear Deal with the West

Mr Ahmadinejad claims Iran's nuclear programme is ‘peaceful’

It’s not often when I comment about the political scene in the world, but I figure today is a good day. Today, Iran has decided that it is resuming nuclear fuel enrichment, which could be used to make nuclear weapons. Understandibly, along with Iran’s extensive missle program, a “nuclear Iran” is not something the West (specifically Europe and the United States, much less Israel) would even tolerate.

Let’s detail a little bit why today, Iran made a stunningly important political move:

First and foremost, this is the perfect time to provoke the US into another large disaster. The U.S., still reeling from natural disasters from the Fall of 2005 & current political scandles, is a bit weak at the moment. The Iranians are not stupid – they beat Iraq in the 1980s even when the United States was giving Iraq weapons and support, including WMDs. The Iranians can see that public support the U.S. operations in Afghanistan and Iraq are dwindling. Public support for future operations in the Middle East will be next to impossible to garnish public support for, much less win.

The EU is in now way prepared to fight Iran without U.S. help, and Iran knows this.

Israel, with the current lack of leadership given Sharon’s recent illness, is in a weakened state. Iran sees this, and is taking advantage.

Now, North Korea has decided that unless the U.S. lifts the current economic sanctions against the country, there is no point in addressing their nuke issues with the U.S.

Indeed, an interesting day, and the coming days will be even more interesting, as we’ll see how the U.S. and the EU handle Iran’s latest incident.

Hopefully, Israel won’t premptively strike Iran’s reactors, like they did in Iraq in the early 1980’s.

A Government That Does Whatever It Wants To

A recently leaked report has found that the National Security Agency (NSA) has been secretly spying on thousands of Americans since 9/11/01. Apparently, President Bush signed a secret order allowing the NSA to do so, spying on American’s email and phone conversations.

President Bush has said that the leaking of this information to the media is illegal. Accordingly, the media and many bi-partisan memebers of Congress have said while the leaking of the information may be illegal, the act itself of spying on Americans without a court order is in direct violation of United States law.

Responding to criticism, President Bush states:
“This authorization is a vital tool in our war against the terrorists. It is critical to saving American lives. The American people expect me to do everything in my power, under our laws and Constitution, to protect them and their civil liberties and that is exactly what I will continue to do as long as I am president of the United States,”.

Now if that isn’t the biggest bunch of BS I’ve evere seen, I’m not sure what is. Since 9/12/01, civil liberties and personal freedoms have taken a backseat to searchings, unlawful imprisonment of “enemy combatants”, and now, illegal wiretaps.

And all former President Bill Clinton did to get impeached was lie about a private matter between himself, his wife, and an intern.

Think about that.

“Those who give up liberty for the sake of security deserve neither liberty nor security.” -Benjamin Franklin.

If we are destroyed from within, the terrorists need never fire another shot.

A Government That Failed Its People

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. –That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. –Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refuted his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred. to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. –And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

–John Hancock

New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts:
John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut:
Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York:
William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey:
Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware:
Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland:
Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia:
George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina:
William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia:
Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

The American Terrorist – Pat Robertson


If you haven’t heard it already, conservative religious rightwinger – Pat Robertson – said on his “700 Club” show that we should assassinate Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela.

Now, minus all of the boring details, this is what Pat Robertson said originally:

“If he thinks we’re trying to assassinate him, I think we really ought to go ahead and do it. It’s a whole lot cheaper than starting a war. We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability. We don’t need another $200 billion war to get rid of one strong-arm dictator. It’s a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with.”

Amid much public backlash here in America, from Venezuela, and from around the world, Robertson apologized today, 48 hours after he made the statement. In the “apology” (which was more of a clarification), he said he was misinterpreted.

“Is it right to call for assassination? No, and I apologize for that statement,” he said in a written statement. I didn’t say ‘assassination.’ I said our special forces should ‘take him out.’ And ‘take him out’ can be a number of things, including kidnapping; there are a number of ways to take out a dictator from power besides killing him. I was misinterpreted by the AP [Associated Press], but that happens all the time,”

Now, “take him out” to me means assassination.

U.S. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said Tuesday that Robertson has the right of any private citizen to say whatever he wants but added that the broadcaster’s remarks “do not represent the views of the United States.”

U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld also dismissed Robertson’s comments Tuesday, saying “our department doesn’t do that kind of thing.”

Alvarez said the Christian Coalition, which Robertson started but no longer leads, claims some 2 million members and helped jump-start President Bush’s 2000 presidential campaign after his New Hampshire primary loss to Sen. John McCain.

He has suggested in the past that a meteor could strike Florida because of unofficial “Gay Days” at Disney World and that feminism caused women to kill their children, practice witchcraft and become lesbians.

And that, my friends, is insanity.